President Donald Trump’s taxpayer-funded ballroom just hit a major roadblock. A Republican senator confirmed the $1 billion earmark for the White House’s new 90,000-square-foot ballroom and its security upgrades has been scrapped from the latest spending bill. Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana said the money is officially out, at least for now. That’s a sharp turn from the original pitch, which promised no federal funding would be needed for the project.
Recommended Videos
According to Reuters, the ballroom, which would seat up to 1,000 people, was supposed to replace the demolished East Wing of the White House. Trump has framed it as a necessary upgrade, but the funding request has been a moving target. What started as a self-funded project quickly morphed into a billion-dollar ask from Congress, with Republicans arguing the money would cover security enhancements for the ballroom and other Secret Service needs.
Democrats, unsurprisingly, have called it a “gilded vanity project,” and it seems even some Republicans aren’t sold on the idea. Senate Majority Leader John Thune didn’t sugarcoat the situation. He told reporters there were “a couple snags” holding up the $72 billion immigration enforcement bill, and the East Wing modernization was one of them.
Thune also hinted at another complication
Even if the ballroom funding is dropped, there’s still the question of whether the $780 million in additional Secret Service spending will stay in the bill. That’s a lot of money to untangle, especially when the broader immigration funding is already causing friction. Democrats argue the Department of Homeland Security is already well-funded and have pushed for new restrictions on its law enforcement operations, which Republicans have flat-out rejected.
The ballroom funding controversy isn’t happening in a vacuum. It’s part of a larger battle over the $72 billion bill, which is shaping up to be a flashpoint as midterm elections loom. But the ballroom itself has become a symbol of the broader spending disputes, and it’s clear not everyone in Trump’s own party is on board. Thune’s comments suggest the real issue isn’t just the parliamentarian’s ruling but the fact that there aren’t enough Republican votes to keep the funding.
Sen. Kennedy: Trump ballroom funding removed from spending bill via @staradvertiser https://t.co/ufr506liQT
— Dorothy Urada (@DotUrada) May 21, 2026
Speaking of the parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough has been in the crosshairs lately. Trump took to Truth Social to slam her, calling her “brutal to Republicans” while letting Democrats off easy. He even suggested firing her, arguing Republicans play too soft compared to Democrats, who “cheat, lie, and steal” but stick together.
Thune, however, wasn’t having it
He called Trump’s attacks “concerning,” especially if they could turn MacDonough into a political target or pose a security risk. Thune made it clear he hasn’t even considered replacing her, and doing so would likely backfire by making it even harder to round up the votes needed for the ballroom funding.
MacDonough’s ruling over the weekend was a blow to the project, as she determined the security funding for the ballroom didn’t meet the strict requirements for inclusion in the budget reconciliation package. But Thune downplayed her role as the main obstacle, instead pointing to the bigger issue: vote count.
Senate GOP drops Trump ballroom funding. https://t.co/mkZnAukzrZ Republicans dropped Trump's $1B ballroom after failing to secure enough party support while facing backlash and a parliamentarian ruling. Trump created a $1B hole in the ground. It takes a special idiot to do that.
— The Conscious Underground (@AllanAgard) May 21, 2026
If Republicans can’t even agree among themselves, the ballroom funding doesn’t stand a chance. Thune’s response when asked if there were enough GOP votes? “We’ll get back to you on that.” That’s not exactly a ringing endorsement.
The whole situation is a mess of competing priorities. On one hand, you’ve got a high-profile project that Trump wants, complete with a price tag that’s hard to justify when other funding battles are raging. On the other, you’ve got Republicans trying to pass a massive immigration enforcement bill while fending off Democratic criticism and internal divisions. Throw in a parliamentarian who’s now a political punching bag, and it’s no wonder the ballroom funding got the axe.
Senate parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough ruled the entire $1 billion funding provision for Trump’s ballroom violated Senate rules, & it was stripped from the DHS bill.
— powermacuser1 (@powermacuser1) May 21, 2026
Trump immediately called the Senate Majority Leader John Thune & demanded she be fired. John Thune refused,⬇️
It’s hard to say what’s next
The ballroom might be out of the current bill, but that doesn’t mean the idea is dead. If Republicans can’t agree on the funding now, they might try to revisit it later, especially if Trump keeps pushing for it. But for the moment, the project is stuck in limbo, and the $1 billion earmark is off the table. That’s a win for taxpayers, even if it’s not the final word.
The bigger question is whether this is a sign of things to come. If Republicans can’t rally behind a project Trump wants, what does that mean for the rest of their agenda? The midterms are just around the corner, and every vote counts. The ballroom might be a luxury, but the immigration bill is a priority. If they can’t agree on the former, how will they handle the latter?
(Featured image: G. Edward Johnson)
