Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Bangkok Post
Bangkok Post
National

Thailand to join UN maritime arbitration with Cambodia

Demonstrators wave a giant flag during a rally held in August 2025 in Bangkok to demand the cancellation of two agreements between Thailand and Cambodia related to contested land and sea boundaries. The latter, signed in 2001 (2544 in the Buddhist calendar) and popularly known MoU 44, was cancelled by the Anutin Charnvirakul government this year. The fate of MoU 43, signed in 2000, remains undecided. (Photo: Apichart Jinakul)

Thailand said on Friday it would join ‌a UN arbitration process chosen by Cambodia to resolve a decades-long maritime boundary dispute, but it has put on hold for now other two-way efforts to settle their contested borders.

This week Cambodia launched a compulsory conciliation process under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (Unclos), after Bangkok decided last month to unilaterally end a ​2001 framework pact for talks on ⁠a disputed maritime belt.

For more than 25 years, both have claimed about 26,000 square kilometres of sea in the Gulf of Thailand, estimated to hold nearly 12 trillion cubic feet of natural gas and large volumes ‌of oil, for a total value of $300 billion.

Thailand will send two international law experts to the UN-backed negotiations, Foreign Minister Sihasak Phuangketkeow said on Friday, but expressed dismay at Cambodia’s move to also use the talks to tackle questions of resource sharing.

“I told my Cambodian colleagues, ‘Why don’t we ⁠give talks a chance? Six months or something,’” he told Reuters in an interview.

“’If we cannot make progress, then we can agree on the next step, which of course includes compulsory conciliation, but it also includes voluntary conciliation.’”

Thailand ‘not coerced’

Speaking after a briefing with 67 diplomats and representatives of international organisations, Mr Sihasak on Thursday insisted that Thailand entered the process on its own terms.

He said Cambodia made public its decision to use the compulsory conciliation process on Tuesday, before officially notifying Thailand.

“And since June 2, we’ve not had any discussion informally, formally with the Cambodian side.”

He said reports suggesting Thailand was forced into the Unclos mechanism were inaccurate, noting that Thailand terminated the 2001 memorandum of understanding to enable discussions under a new framework.

“We are not being dragged into the process. We entered it knowing exactly what decision we were making. When Cambodia chose this path, we participated with confidence in our own position and not under Cambodia’s conditions,” he said.

In ​response to Reuters queries, Cambodian Foreign Minister Prak Sokhonn said two-way efforts to resolve the dispute had been exhausted, prompting Cambodia’s choice.

“Cambodia hopes that the Thai government will engage with this process in good faith,” he ​said.

No other two-way talks

Despite joining the mediation, Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul said Bangkok would not hold any other two-way talks, including those to manage and resolve land border ​issues.

“We ⁠will use UNCLOS, which means from now on there will be no more talks … or other forms of cooperation,” he added. “We will not discuss the restoration of relations yet.”

All border gates ⁠between Thailand and Cambodia would stay closed, he said.

Ties have been on edge after two rounds of intense border clashes last year killed nearly 150 people and displaced at least 300,000 on both sides, but a December ceasefire still holds.

Cambodia’s choice of compulsory conciliation, in which a five-member panel makes non-binding recommendations, ⁠will not improve overall ties between the two countries, said Mr Sihasak, who is also a deputy prime ​minister.

“We simply don’t agree with how they approached this,” he said.

So far, only East Timor, also known as Timor Leste, has used the UN-backed process to successfully resolve a decades-long maritime dispute with Australia, taking just under two years.

“If we do this through bilateral talk in a friendly way, ‌it may take a shorter time to ⁠reach an amicable solution,” Mr Sihasak said. “Now, we don’t know ​how long this will take.”

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.