A lawyer who sued an upstate New York airport after it rejected a small advertisement for her sexual harassment law firm has now seen her message displayed on a massive sign at the facility.
Megan Thomas had signed a contract last summer for an ad at Syracuse Hancock International Airport, intending it to read: “When HR called it harmless flirting … we called it exhibit A.” However, airport officials requested she soften the "harsh" wording.
Instead of complying, Thomas filed a lawsuit. The advertisement is now finally in place, with its original wording intact – and significantly larger than she had initially planned.
Two walls of the travel hub are emblazoned with the prominent, pink advertisement, alongside a huge photograph of Thomas, as first reported by Syracuse.com.
"When the airport told me the First Amendment did not apply and that they could do what they liked, I realized I would need to bring a lawsuit," Thomas said this week.
"I understood that if I won this battle, it would protect not only my rights, but also the rights of other women who come after me."
Thomas explained she intentionally chose to advertise at the airport because many of her clients have reported experiencing sexual harassment during work trips, and she sought a prominent placement for her message.
In her federal lawsuit filed in August, Thomas said the Syracuse Regional Airport Authority, which operates the airport, approved a draft version of her ad. But the following day, she said, the authority told her the ad was not approved and that the slogan was “considered to be a bit harsh."
During a follow-up call, Thomas said she was told the airport authority's leadership believed the proposed ad might be viewed as “threatening” or “intimidating” to men. And the following day, an official said the ad would not be displayed due to concerns about negative feedback from community members and that local politicians might find it offensive, according to her suit.
In court documents, lawyers for the SRAA said the authority offered alternate slogans “that conveyed a similar message in a more professional and less misleading and disparaging manner."
A judge disagreed with their assessment of the tagline, saying in a preliminary decision in January that the authority's claim was “nonsense.”
Judge Anthony Brindisi said Thomas' slogan was no more misleading than a Chick-fil-A ad at the airport featuring a cow and the phrase “Chikin 4 Din Makez U Grin” suggested "that chicken dinners will always make a person happy, or that cows can speak.”
The two sides reached a confidential settlement shortly after the judge's ruling. The new, larger ad went up a few weeks ago.
Thomas — who also has another, smaller ad in the airport — says calls to her Syracuse-based firm have been “way up” since the sign went up, noting that she has hired another attorney and plans to hire another office staffer to assist her.
In a statement issued Tuesday, the SRAA called the judge's decision “unfortunate” but said the settlement “permits both parties to return focus to their core corporate purposes while preserving the authority’s ability to manage and operate the airport."
Diabetes advocates cross their fingers as a bipartisan bill revives efforts to lower insulin costs
Immigrants seeking asylum are ordered to countries they've never been to, but end up stuck in limbo
All the times Trump has vowed to resolve a crisis in ‘two to three weeks’
5 key takeaways from Trump’s first address to nation since start of Iran war
Trump discussed ousting Bondi following backlash over Epstein files release: reports
Trump slurs his way through jaw-dropping Iran war address with no clear end in sight
